Inbound Internet Marketing Blog

SEO, Blogging, Social Media, Landing Pages, Lead Generation and Analytics

SUBSCRIBE

The HubSpot Inbound Internet Marketing blog covers all of inbound marketing - SEO, blogging, social media, lead generation, email marketing, lead nurturing & management, and analytics. Join 53,183 others and subscribe now!

Subscribe to RSS feed Add us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter

Get Free Marketing Info!

Get the world's best marketing resources right to your inbox! Join more than 817,000 inbound marketers!

Subscribe by email

Your email:

Listen to this blog!

Work at HubSpot!

JoinTheHubSpotTeam resized 200

HubSpot's Inbound Internet Marketing Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Stopping The Google AdWords Morphine Drip: How We Saved $183 Last Week

 

.

I have written a number of articles about the importance of being found in Google, especially for B2B marketing.  Though Google AdWords is a great way for businesses to start getting immediate results for search engine marketing -- in the longer term, we think the optimal strategy is a balanced approach to PPC (pay-per-click) efforts like Google AdWords and SEO (Search Engine Optimization) efforts.  Too often, businesses get very used to the "morphine drip" of Google AdWords and forget that there are other ways to draw traffic from search engines. 

It is widely believed by search marketing experts that more people click on the "unpaid" search results on the left in Google (vs. the AdWords on the right).  Question is, just how much more?  And, though everyone knows free is better, how much better?  Is it really worth all the time and effort to try and rank in the organic search results?

Lets take a look at one small example within our own company.  We are now ranking for the term "internet marketing software".  This is a good thing, because, as it turns out, that precisely describes what we do. HubSpot ranks #6 for this term in the unpaid/natural results.  This gave us 25 visitors last week  So, 25 people  searched on that phrase in Googlek, saw us in the results, and clicked through to our website.  This is not that much traffic, but even then, we would have had to pay Google $183 for this traffic because the average CPC (cost-per-click) is about $7.32 for that phrase.  So essentially, we're saving over $700/month on just this phrase alone and getting lots of great qualified traffic to our site.  This is what gets us excited about SEO.  But, let's look at some more data.

Most people know that in order to actually be found in Google, you need to be on the first page of results.  But where on the first page, exactly?  Well, recently I looked at a variety of data from Enquior and Marketing Sherpa to compile some aggregate results on Google searches, specifically to see "where the action is" or where people looked and clicked.

Here is an eye tracking image of the first page of Google showing what areas people looked at the most.  Red shows the areas where more people looked for longer periods of time, blue areas got less attention, and grey not much at all.  I discussed heat map images before in the article "3 Hot Marketing Tips from Heat Map Analysis"  But here I wanted to go a step further.  What I have done is overlayed some statistics on the heat map image to show where people click.

google heat map

google eye track heat map seo vs sem


Here are the key takeaways from the data and the images above:

1) Organic results get 75%+ of the attention.  People don't click on the ads nearly as much as the organic results.

2) The first organic result gets over 25% of all clicks.  Within the organic results, the first result gets the most clicks by far - more than double the second result.

3) Within the ads, the first ad also gets the most clicks.  But, since you pay per click for the ads, you should care less about volume and more about if the traffic will actually convert and what your cost per lead and cost per sale will be.

4) There are a good number of clicks on all top 10 organic results.  Even the last result gets about 3% of people to click on it - this is about the same rate as the second pay per click ad, and unlike the ad, its free!

Note: Google heat map images from Marketing Sherpa.

 

SEO kit

Posted by Mike Volpe on Thu, Jul 26, 2007 @ 11:22 AM

COMMENTS

One thing I often see under emphasized in these conversations is WHAT YOU LOOK LIKE IN THE SEARCH RESULTS. For example, you guys look like this: "Leads, Internet Marketing Software | HubSpot Leads from Internet Marketing Software by HubSpot to generate more sales leads and customers for your business through Internet marketing and SEO promotion ..." Do you think that there are changes you could make to your title tag and meta description that would get you more clicks? I do. The big question is, would it compromise your rankings? It's a helluva challenge to craft copy that ranks well AND converts well. Hell, this is a blog post in itself. I'm going to go write one. Prepare for linkage. :-)

posted on Thursday, July 26, 2007 at 12:42 PM by Tony Wright


Tony: This is an exceptionally good point. One thing that we still are debating internally is the best copywriting that drives a combination of great rankings AND high click-throughs. We're putting some software in place to help us "measure" this to see what works better. At the end of the day, high rankings don't matter if nobody clicks on the link. In fact, chances are, Google will reduce rankings for a search result that is not getting a lot of clicks.

posted on Thursday, July 26, 2007 at 12:48 PM by


You are right about that last statement. Number of clicks, time spent on site, site bookmarks, all will eventually, if not already, determine exactly who is most relevant for those coveted first page placements. Google's Universal Search will make less space available for first page listings in the very near future. SEO can get you listed high in the rankings but you better have a "sticky" site if you plan to dominate that first page placement for any length of time.

posted on Thursday, July 26, 2007 at 2:22 PM by Terry Reeves


I feel like that heat map is probably somewhat biased. Does it take into account how often people already know exactly which website they're looking for?

posted on Thursday, July 26, 2007 at 6:23 PM by Mark Tiefenbruck


Mark, that's an interesting point. I know a lot of people who use Google as the "Lazy Man's URL". They'll type "IBM" into google rather than just go to IBM.com. Would be interesting to look at heat maps for varying search types.

posted on Thursday, July 26, 2007 at 6:37 PM by Tony Wright


Being a veteran of the PPC industry (former FindWhat.com/Miva employee) has given me a lot of incite on this crazy anomaly called Google. To many it seems impossible to know what to place/change in your site to boost your organic rankings. Sites like HubSpot do a great job at kick starting the process. There are other resources available online that can guide you. Search for "search engine ranking factors". You'll find your guide within the first non-paid results. Best of luck to those who are struggling. Drop me a line if you need some help. Hubspot, you guys rock!

posted on Friday, July 27, 2007 at 8:26 AM by David Adorno


Comments have been closed for this article.