Inbound Internet Marketing Blog

SEO, Blogging, Social Media, Landing Pages, Lead Generation and Analytics

SUBSCRIBE

The HubSpot Inbound Internet Marketing blog covers all of inbound marketing - SEO, blogging, social media, lead generation, email marketing, lead nurturing & management, and analytics. Join 59,680 others and subscribe now!

Subscribe to RSS feed Add us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter

Get Free Marketing Info!

Get the world's best marketing resources right to your inbox! Join more than 817,000 inbound marketers!

Subscribe by email

Your email:

HubSpot's Inbound Internet Marketing Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

3 Simple Design Tips to Make Charts That Don't Suck

 

.

Raise your hand if you love data.

Now raise your hand if data presented like this makes you want to stick a fork in your eye:


morewhitespace resized 600

 

It’s colorful. It’s brimming with data. But HOLY HORSESHOE is it confusing!

Having data is awesome. Using it to persuade others is powerful. Presenting it in a way that inspires eye-forking is criminal.

Here are three simple design tips to help you make sexier, simpler charts that are sure to elicit applause and approval, not violence.

TIP #1: Make friends with white space.

Tempting as it is to fill your chart with every possible data point, detail, and label, there’s an extremely good reason to fight this urge: The human brain uses contrast to distinguish objects from one another. White space is one of the easiest, most elegant design tools that creates this contrast and increases the likelihood that your audience will grasp the point you’re trying to make.

Compare this version of a basic bar chart with the one below it.

 

CHART #1:

basic bar chart

 

CHART #2:

describe the image

 

By removing the grid lines and tick marks along both axes, as well as the value labels along the vertical axis, and deleting superfluous content from the bottom left corner, we’ve made it much easier to glance at this chart and see that more blogging results in a lot more leads.

Which is a perfect segue into the next tip…

TIP #2: Don't just share data. MAKE MEANING!

It’s common practice for charts to be labeled with a sentence that simply describes what data is being presented. In the example above, the title clearly states that what we’re looking at: The Impact of Blog Size on Monthly Leads.

Fine, right?

Wrong. To maximize the impact of your charts and graphs, don’t just state the obvious, explain why it matters. What’s the core point you’re trying to make? Is it that 52 or more blog articles per month yields an average of 23 leads?

So? What action do you want your audience to take as a result of seeing this data?

Blog more?

So tell them that! Better yet, use a touch of color to draw their eye to the specific data element(s) that drive your point home.

 

better chart

Now isn’t that better?

Last but certainly not least, design tip #3…

TIP #3: Serve bite-size pieces.

Nobody likes biting off more than they can chew.  Well, except for maybe this guy.

 

dont bite off more than you can chew

 

Most of us, however, prefer tasty bite size morsels that we can savor and enjoy without unhinging our jaws.

So instead of something like this:

 

too much data

 

…consider chunking up the data into smaller pieces that are more easily digestible (and more effective at conveying your core message)…

 

bite size

 

…like so:

twitter

 

Better, right?

To summarize:

MORE WHITE SPACE!


more white space

 


 MAKE MEANING!


make meaning

 

SMALL TASTY BITES!


bite size data


And voila! No more sucky charts.

essential-im-guide

Posted by Marta Kagan on Fri, Sep 30, 2011 @ 08:00 AM

COMMENTS

Marta, 
 
I like your advice, keep it simple and clear. 
 
Regards. 
 
Freddy

posted on Friday, September 30, 2011 at 5:56 AM by Freddy


"Holy Horseshoe" just totally made my day. Thanks!

posted on Friday, September 30, 2011 at 8:22 AM by Matt Shaw


Love the title; had to open the article because of it! Great examples with graphics to make your point. Thanks for the post. 
 
 
 
Jamie

posted on Friday, September 30, 2011 at 8:31 AM by jamie resker


That shark made me giggle for a good few minutes.

posted on Friday, September 30, 2011 at 8:36 AM by Anum Hussain


Love the headline! Seen many charts that do not deliver or get to the point (they sucked!) Coffee and Hubspot in my inbox, makes the morning meetings more productive. Thank you!

posted on Friday, September 30, 2011 at 8:57 AM by Beth Kessler


It is interesting how the training people recieve propigates this trend. A basic way to hide your lack of knowledge is to confuse with data. 
 
 
 
http://catalyst13.speech4u.hop.clickbank.net

posted on Friday, September 30, 2011 at 10:21 AM by Paul Preble


Marta, Thanks for showing us that complex graphs and charts don't work very well. Simplicity is better.

posted on Friday, September 30, 2011 at 11:01 AM by Joshua Smith


Amen and Hallelujah! There's nothing worse in (conversation or virtually)then making a potential lead's eyes glaze over.  
 
Side benefit is that it makes us hone our skills at discerning what your target market wants and then distilling the data down to focus on their needs and wants. 
 
Great post.

posted on Friday, September 30, 2011 at 11:01 AM by Herb Jones


Thank you very dim learn.

posted on Sunday, October 02, 2011 at 1:19 AM by badana


But I like sucky charts. They make it sooo much easier to snooze during presentations.

posted on Sunday, October 02, 2011 at 8:03 PM by Alan Graner


Your examples are destroying information, without always adding meaning. A better version of how to clarify the first example, using Tufte's principle of data/ink maximisation, is this by Tim Bray. 
 
What I'd rather see is all 767 data points on a scatter plot, to see if you have a real correlation. The original binned and median processing stage has removed the point of making a chart in the first place. You might as well just us a slogan. 
 
Your 3rd example is backwards. apart from the gratuitous 3D, the first one has a good data/ink ratio, though separating each year-on-year comparison would help. Again, reducing one line to a pie chart is going from a chart that presents the data to a conclusion that is in effect a slogan. 
 
Post your source data in a Google spreadsheet, and we can see if your data supports your conclusions. Delete most of it and you may as well just say 'trust me, I'm a marketer'

posted on Tuesday, October 04, 2011 at 12:20 AM by Kevin Marks


You oversimplified the stacked bar chart. It seems an important part of that chart is the comparison between 2010 and 2009. The bar chart does this comparison poorly. 
 
An alternative approach is to group together critical and important, as you did in the pie, but plot two lines, one for critical + important in 2010, one for the same in 2009. 
 
I made a dot plot showing this in OnlineServices20102009.png.

posted on Tuesday, October 04, 2011 at 9:03 AM by Jon Peltier


Comments have been closed for this article.