Internet Marketing Blog

The HubSpot Inbound Internet Marketing blog covers all of inbound marketing - SEO, Blogging, Social Media, Landing Pages, Lead Generation and Analytics.

Subscribe to our RSS Feed
HubSpot RSS Feed

HubSpot on Twitter HubSpot on Facebook HubSpot on LinkedIn HubSpot on Google Buzz HubSpot Blog RSS

Subscribe via Email

Your email:

Get Certified in Inbound Marketing

Inbound Marketing University - Free Marketing Training Online Classes

Inbound Marketing Software

Learn how HubSpot can help turn your business into an inbound marketing machine.

Website Grader Badge

Marketing Resources

Grader.com Tools
 
inbound marketing book

Connect with Us

Want to share your Inbound Marketing advice with the community? Submit guest post ideas to rburnes[at]hubspot[dot]com.

HubSpot's Inbound Internet Marketing Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Internet Marketing Data Predicts the Patriots will Win the Super Bowl over the Giants

 | Submit to Digg digg it | Submit to Reddit reddit | Add to delicious delicious | Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Share on Facebook Facebook | Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn 


Please read the whole article before you decide I am crazy. You can think I am crazy at the end of the article, but hear me out first. After all, we did send out a news release about my Super Bowl and Internet marketing data opinion.

What data can you use to predict who will win the Super Bowl? The sportscasters on TV use their own understanding of the teams and their expertise in understanding football. They are rarely better than probably 65% accurate in their predictions. The oddsmakers in Las Vegas essentially use a popularity contest to predict the winning team for a game. Based on how many people are placing bets on either team, they adjust the "spread" or the number of points by which one team is predicted to beat another team so that there are an equal number of people betting on each side. The size of the point spread indicates how many people think the favored team will win relative to the other team. Currently the New England Patriots are favored to win by about 14 points, meaning most people think the Patriots will win the Super Bowl.

I think you can also use Internet data to make as accurate a prediction about who will win the Super Bowl as the sportscasting experts or the oddmakers in Las Vegas. Here is a list of the data I used to make this prediction and why each piece of data matters. All data is from the Website Grader Marketing and SEO Tool.

How Internet Marketing Predicts Patriots will Beat Giants in Super Bowl

Just like Las Vegas, many pieces of Internet data are based on popularity. More people visiting your website is better, more people linking to your website is better, more people bookmarking your website is better. And the Patriots dominate all of these Internet marketing metrics - sort of surprising when you remember that the Giants have a fan base in the most densely populated metropolitan area in North America.

  1. Patriots have a lot more Website Traffic. The Patriots Alexa rank is 13,000, putting them in the top 0.11% of all websites, while the Giants are only in the top 0.2%. The Patriots are getting a lot more website visitors. As a comparison point, the HubSpot website has a similar Alexa rank to the Giants website - and we're just a two year old startup.
  2. Patriots have more inbound links than the Giants.This was a big shock to me. Links on the Internet are like recommendations in the offline world. More recommendations from more trustworthy sources are good. And the Patriots have far more links than the Giants - almost 428,000 for the Patriots to the Giants' 186,000. This one isn't even close. This really shocked me since the Giants are a good team that you would expect to get a lot of coverage and links to their website.
  3. Patriots have more online bookmarks. For those of you not familiar with the Del.icio.us social bookmarking service, it is just a way for people to store bookmarks online instead of in their web browser. This makes it possible for you to share them with other people, plus they are search-able, and you can use the data to measure things. I think that measuring the number of online bookmarks is a great way to measure how much people like your content, and the effects of any viral marketing. The Patriots have 133 bookmarks and the Giants have 98.
  4. The Patriots are winning in search engines. Search engine optimization is the use of best practice marketing techniques to help your company get found in search engines when people are looking for the products or services that you sell. For the search terms "superbowl champion", "superbowl champions", "super bowl champion", and "super bowl champions" the Patriots are on the first page of Google results. The Giants are nowhere to be found on the first 10 pages of results. While I would expect the Patriots to beat the Giants on this one, I am surprised it was basically impossible to find the Giants.
  5. Patriots have a higher Google Page Rank.While it is becoming less important and people do tend to pay attention to it too much, Page Rank is a measure of how important Google thinks you are online. It is a 1 to 10 scale and the higher the number, the better. The Giants are a very respectable 6 (HubSpot's homepage is a 6). However the Patriots are a 7 - this is the same as NFL.com. A Page Rank of 7 might not seem that much better than a 6, until I tell you that it is an exponential scale, and according to my estimates a 7 is about 4 times better or harder to get than a 6.

Summary of Super Bowl Internet Marketing Data


Website Grade Inbound Links Google Page Rank Del.icio.us Bookmarks Alexa Traffic Rank

Patriots

87

425,689

7

133

13,088

Giants

97

186,761

6

98

25,285

Obviously the real goal here is to have a bit of fun, but I do think there's a correlation (but not causality) between these Internet marketing statistics and who is most likely to win the Super Bowl, if only because teams that are more productive on the field are more likely to be more popular and win the Internet marketing popularity contest.

Finally, some of you probably noticed that the Giants actually have an overall Website Grader that is higher than the Patriots. This is because the Patriots have a "splash page" for the Super Bowl on their homepage - and this splash page has almost no links, almost no text. Splash pages like this really hurt you in term of getting found and converting leads online, so they get penalized heavily.

What do you think? How crazy am I? Do you agree with any of this? Leave a comment below and let's discuss.

 

internet marketing kit


Posted by Mike Volpe on Tue, Jan 29, 2008 @ 09:45 AM

COMMENTS

Mike, stick to internet marketing.
1. Picking a 14 point favorite to win isn't exactly going out on a limb
2. The best football betting people in the business only pick 59% over an extended period of time because a football is shaped like a football (it bounces funny)
3. I see absolutely no correlation to internet marketing data and sports betting :-)

posted on Tuesday, January 29, 2008 at 10:20 AM by DT23


Maybe you should contact the Patriots and sign them on as a Hubspot customer. I don't know if I can agree with you on your theory. It seems like you are saying that the most popular team on the internet is the likely winner, the best team? Web traffic correlates to productivity?
I'd like to point out that http://www.britneyspears.com has an Alexa rank of 27,739 and inbound links of 131,608. The site for the Grateful Dead, http://www.thedead.net, has an Alexa rank of 131,608 and inbound links of 73,082. So, I guess that makes Britney the clear winner? Her web stats indicate more public interest in her life and music. Oh, the humanity...

posted on Tuesday, January 29, 2008 at 10:45 AM by Daniel Elliott


Somebody is clear Patriots fan ;)
My thinking on this is that your data indicates:
1. patriots is a more popular team
2. patriots does a better job is promoting a site.
if you could draw a correlation between winning Super Bowl and the above two points then maybe...
My appoach would be: the team that has a better management probably has a higher chances of winning, which i think is a reasonable assumption.
The statistics you used demonstrates that patriots has a better management, hence the team has better chances of winning ;)
Anyway, it was a fun reading!

posted on Tuesday, January 29, 2008 at 11:37 AM by Yelena Kadeykina


Great read and enjoyed the thought process, albeit as DT23 notes, not tough to pick the favored team.
Now, the question is: if the Giants increased their marketing (maybe through hubspot) could they shut down Brady? That would be a theory worth proving out.

posted on Tuesday, January 29, 2008 at 12:42 PM by Peter Tripp


I love the way you attempt to predict the results of the Super Bowl based on web comparisons. Completely unrelated to playing a football game, but tha'ts just the tech guys in us always trying to relate everything to the web and hard data.

posted on Tuesday, January 29, 2008 at 1:09 PM by Kyle


Cute.
Think of all those football fans that are going to get a quick internet marketing lesson. :-)

posted on Tuesday, January 29, 2008 at 1:30 PM by peter caputa


Ha, cute!
I'd love your prediction on the accuracy of the spread... a bit more difficult.
p.s. Go Pats! ;-)

posted on Tuesday, January 29, 2008 at 1:39 PM by Tracey


If the Patriots are the winners to be (based on website marketability), then why do the Giants have a higher Website Score?
Is there a problem with the grader?

posted on Tuesday, January 29, 2008 at 2:28 PM by Robert


Great post Mike except for one thing.
Alexa data??? Seriously? C'mon now Compete data is the new standard! :-)
When's Website Grader going to be upgraded to include Compete data?
Cheers,
David

posted on Tuesday, January 29, 2008 at 2:33 PM by David Cancel


I love the article. It is great to try to have fun and pseudo-quantify something like this. You got me thinking, what do the same numbers look like for past Superbowls or even World Series match ups?

posted on Tuesday, January 29, 2008 at 2:57 PM by Andrew Shepard


Agreed. WSG should include compete data.

posted on Tuesday, January 29, 2008 at 3:08 PM by peter caputa


I'm interested to know more info regarding the Dallas Cowboys and New York Yankees.
Maybe you should do a Top 10 for sports franchises.
Granted, many of the posts above find this light hearted, but I think lots of these sports franchises would find this analysis interesting since the profit handsomely off selling their team gear.

posted on Tuesday, January 29, 2008 at 4:50 PM by Max Baba


hmmmmmmmm. So your theory is that if some team is the most popular (as shown on the internet hits) they will win. When I extrapolate that and apply to the political races I guess I'll have to place my bet on Ron Paul for president

posted on Tuesday, January 29, 2008 at 5:06 PM by jjvon


What's more entertaining is that none of you probably realize that Mike isn't just some Internet dork trying to generate a discussion topic for his superbowl party this weekend. He was also an undrafted free-agent for the Patriots a few years back and got cut the last day of training camp, so he decided to go get a real job. Ask him what it's really like to go head-to-head with Willy McGinest in board drills......

posted on Tuesday, January 29, 2008 at 8:32 PM by Mike Linkovich


A great post! I loved it.

posted on Tuesday, January 29, 2008 at 10:50 PM by 4ALL2ALL


This is a fun post.

posted on Wednesday, January 30, 2008 at 2:43 AM by jimmy reese


After this post Mike has so much traffic he can win the super bowl all by himself :-)
Completely disagree with your theory but enjoyed reading it nevertheles.

posted on Wednesday, January 30, 2008 at 4:36 PM by Pran Kurup


Great idea to compare teams that way :)

posted on Thursday, January 31, 2008 at 2:06 PM by Mathias


@ Most Everyone - Sure, popularity drives links and traffic. But, having a good record drives popularity - so even if the Internet data does not make you a better football team, certainly there is a correlation between better internet data and better teams.
@David Cancel - Thanks for reading. Compete.com has some cool stuff. No comment on any future development plans. :) Missed you at WebInno.
@jjvon - You are right that Ron Paul rules the web. Clearly this did not win him the election.
@Mike Linkovich - Welcome to the blogosphere. :) To those of you not 'in the know' for the private joke, I have never played NFL football, but I did play in college.

posted on Thursday, January 31, 2008 at 4:03 PM by Mike Volpe


Great reading!
Go Pats!

posted on Friday, February 01, 2008 at 1:47 PM by Arpine


OK SKILL IN THE GAME NOT POPULARITY ON THE WEB!

posted on Sunday, February 03, 2008 at 7:58 PM by fairy3945


Guess it was wrong? Can I even trust you internet marketing data anymore? ;)

posted on Tuesday, February 05, 2008 at 7:25 PM by Chad | ProFreelancing


Comments have been closed for this article.