Inbound Internet Marketing Blog

SEO, Blogging, Social Media, Landing Pages, Lead Generation and Analytics

SUBSCRIBE

The HubSpot Inbound Internet Marketing blog covers all of inbound marketing - SEO, blogging, social media, lead generation, email marketing, lead nurturing & management, and analytics. Join 53,183 others and subscribe now!

Subscribe to RSS feed Add us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter

Get Free Marketing Info!

Get the world's best marketing resources right to your inbox! Join more than 817,000 inbound marketers!

Subscribe by email

Your email:

Listen to this blog!

Work at HubSpot!

JoinTheHubSpotTeam resized 200

HubSpot's Inbound Internet Marketing Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Who Owns Your Analytics Data? You, Your Visitors or Google?

 

.

Google announced an interesting new opt-out feature for Google Analytics today. From their blog:

Over the past year, we have been exploring ways to offer users more choice on how their data is collected by Google Analytics. We concluded that the best approach would be to develop a global browser based plug-in to allow users to opt out of being tracked by Google Analytics.  

At HubSpot, we often get asked whether someone should use Google Analytics. My typical response, when asked, is to say, "Why not? It's free, and it measures different data and presents data differently than HubSpot's marketing analytics."  That has developed into the standard answer at HubSpot as we've trained more of our consultants and salespeople. As a result, many of our customers use our analytics tools and Google Analytics side by side. In fact, here's a case study a partner just published that shows data from both tools.

But, I'm left perplexed regarding the purpose of this new opt-out feature.  For marketers, web site analytics is a key tool to help determine ROI of marketing activities and expenditures and help improve conversion paths on a site. It's a key pillar of the inbound marketing methodology that enables businesses to convert visitors into lead and leads into sales. And the data that is important is the aggregate number of visitors and users on a site. The aggregate numbers and trends are what a marketer cares about. But, what happens if a decent percentage of visitors opt out of being tracked? 

  • Leads and sales can't be tied back to marketing activities such as SEO, PPC, email marketing, social media, press releases, etc.
  • Visitor, page view counts, etc. become inaccurate. 

Furthermore, individual user's personal data is not needed in order to draw marketing conclusions, and Google doesn't actually collect personally identifiiable information through Google Analytics. They actually don't allow you to do it either. From their terms of use

7. PRIVACY . You will not (and will not allow any third party to) use the Service to track or collect personally identifiable information of Internet users, nor will You (or will You allow any third party to) associate any data gathered from Your website(s) (or such third parties' website(s)) with any personally identifying information from any source as part of Your use (or such third parties' use) of the Service. You will have and abide by an appropriate privacy policy and will comply with all applicable laws relating to the collection of information from visitors to Your websites. You must post a privacy policy and that policy must provide notice of your use of a cookie that collects anonymous traffic data. 

If I were completely reliant on Google Analytics right now for my business, I'd be questioning who really owns my analytics data? Google? Me? Or my site visitors?

While I generally applaud Google's significant efforts to help us little people maintain some vestige of privacy as we share more and more data with the borg, knowingly or not, I don't understand the point of this move. Is this a trade-off that needs to made? 

It's an interesting issue. I feel like I'm questioning God when I question Google. I'm not sure I have the right answer, either. But, Google's move perplexes me, from the perspective of a marketer, especially.  What do you think?

Updated 10:08 AM - The Onion has a hilarious take on this one. 


Google Opt Out Feature Lets Users Protect Privacy By Moving To Remote Village (Found via bengriffithsme)

Update 10:20 AM - Patricio Robles from econsultancy says:

Needless to say, publishers using Google Analytics will probably not be thrilled at the prospect that certain data won't be collected from a potentially larger number of users. After all, when it comes to web analytics, more is better for most publishers. 

Update 10:23 AM - Frederic Lardinois from ReadWriteWeb says:

If opting out of Google Analytics becomes a widespread phenomenon, this could have wide-reaching consequences for site owners. After all, having detailed analytics about your visitors allows site owners and publishers to tweak their marketing efforts. 

Update 10:25 AM - Matt McGee from Searchengineland gets a comment from Google

Webmasters may be concerned about losing the integrity of their Google Analytics data because it won't be tracking as many web visitors...

...Asked about the impact on web site owners, Google Analytics Group Product Manager Amy Chang sounded unconcerned. "Analytics reports will continue to provide advertisers with robust and valuable data to help improve their websites and advertising campaigns," she said via email.

Seems like a non-answer. 

Video: Marketing Analytics 101: How to Measure the Effectiveness of Your Website

Learn how to Measure the Effectiveness of Your Website.

Download the free video to learn how to Measure the Effectiveness of Your Website.

Posted by Pete Caputa on Fri, Mar 19, 2010 @ 08:37 AM

COMMENTS

Wow! This is not good for the marketing community at all. I agree with you also that the data collected was not so informative that we know WHO is surfing our sites. Not until they become a lead that is. It seems to me this is a bad move. Is it even worth using google analytics if the data is randomly edited my user whims. 
 
I understand not wanting big brother knowing your every move, but online surfing didn't give any important personal data other than your surfing habits. Hmmm, this seems like they are shooting themselves in the foot over at Google.

posted on Friday, March 19, 2010 at 8:55 AM by Dale Berkebile


This is actually really concerning. If we're not able to track data from Google Analytics reliably we'll just have to use a different software. 
 
I'm not sure the purpose of this either. Was there some big privacy outcry that I missed about us counting pageviews and time on site? Where's the threat to privacy there? Analytics is like counting cars on a roadway, it's just non-personal activity information that helps us make decisions.

posted on Friday, March 19, 2010 at 9:15 AM by Sam Mallikarjunan


I'm not worried about this at this stage in the game. How is this different than a site visitor deleting cookies? 
 
At the end of the day, as analysts we learn to compensate for data shortcomings. I have yet to come across a data set of any kind that didn't have flaws. It's just critical that you know those flaws exist and take them into consideration when deciding what the data is telling a business owner. 
 
For a long time we went without the kind of insights Google Analytics provides. Even before this announcement we've accepted that different tracking systems always showed different numbers. So long as we keep your eye on the big picture, we can still pull detailed insights.  
 
Last thought... it's a Type I vs. Type II Error issue. I'd be hard pressed to agree that the person who decides to download and use Google's new plugin is consistently the kind of person who responds to my headline test differently. I think the error will be randomized and thus a non-issue. And if I knew that on average 10% were opting-out (and I'm sure benchmarks will surface), I just increase my overall tracking stats by 10% and I'm back to a fairly accurate point of reference. 
 
I say don't worry about it... disagree? 
 
Chris 
@portma

posted on Friday, March 19, 2010 at 9:34 AM by Chris Clegg


Although I'm also confused Google is taking this step, I'm not upset by this news. I agree with Chris (@portma). Google Analytics is not 100% accurate to begin with (limitations of relying on cookies and JavaScript) and if you expect it to be, you'll make poor decisions. However, Google Analytics insights are still a valuable guide to support decision making. We've always had to compensate for unknown variables, that's not new. 
 
Rick (@epublishmedia)

posted on Friday, March 19, 2010 at 10:11 AM by Rick Allen


There must have been something going on in the background that forced Google's hand as this clearly puts them at a disadvantage vs. Omniture, CoreMetrics, etc. They will harp on this "data gap" when marketing their own solutions. But wouldn't the same force require the paid web analytics firms to offer the same opt-out, including the marketing automation firms and Hubspot as well?

posted on Friday, March 19, 2010 at 10:16 AM by John Rode


Hahaha has anyone verified this? This maybe just be a sinister and brilliant ploy by HubSpot to get us all to do what @Shawn said above... :P

posted on Friday, March 19, 2010 at 10:45 AM by Sam Mallikarjunan


From my perspective this is a non-event. Privacy advocates like myself having been opting out for years with plugins like NoScript and AdBlock. I don't allow any type of analytics or marketing scripts to run in my browser, I don't want my browsing habits to be tracked across multiple websites. Impression statistics can be gleaned from webserver access logs and tools like awstats. But let's be honest, this is a nonevent. People who want to opt out are already doing so.

posted on Friday, March 19, 2010 at 11:52 AM by Todd Hudgens


I think it's pretty obvious why Google is doing this. In addition to "opt out" of Google Analytics, the new system will also allow you to "opt in" to sharing additional information such as demographics, interests, etc. Matt Cutts has already shared that of the people that visit Google's privacy settings page, 4x as many people opt to share additional information than choose to add privacy. Seems like a pretty sensical move to me that will benefit everyone.

posted on Saturday, March 20, 2010 at 9:18 AM by Sean Weigold Ferguson


Many claim that privacy is a big concern in the digital age. At the same time, we want (maybe even need) to take advantage of digital tools available to us.  
 
Here are two questions related to the Google Analytics case and the general privacy concerns in the digital age: 
(1) To what extent can we maintain our privacy if we tried? 
(2) Can we afford to maintain our privacy in the digital age? 
(3) How do people choose to whom they give up their private information. 
 
I believe that people tend to NOT maintain their privacy, and they choose to give out private information if they feel they will gain something from it. 
 
What makes this case interesting is that people are gaining quite a bit from google analytics, but might not be aware of it!  
 
There was a recent panel discussion at Carnegie Mellon University discussing privacy issues in social media. You can check out the video here, or view the live blogging coverage on Exponential Web

posted on Saturday, March 20, 2010 at 2:09 PM by Haris Krijestorac


isnt there another analytics except google , is there someone know .

posted on Saturday, April 03, 2010 at 4:33 PM by osman


Comments have been closed for this article.