Inbound Internet Marketing Blog

SEO, Blogging, Social Media, Landing Pages, Lead Generation and Analytics

SUBSCRIBE

The HubSpot Inbound Internet Marketing blog covers all of inbound marketing - SEO, blogging, social media, lead generation, email marketing, lead nurturing & management, and analytics. Join 59,680 others and subscribe now!

Subscribe to RSS feed Add us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter

Get Free Marketing Info!

Get the world's best marketing resources right to your inbox! Join more than 817,000 inbound marketers!

Subscribe by email

Your email:

HubSpot's Inbound Internet Marketing Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Surprise! Internal B2B Email Lists Are Far More Effective Than Third-Party Lists

 

.

Imagine this: Your company is making a big push to generate leads in Q2. Your CEO is making this a top priority, doubling your lead-gen budget. This is important, so you focus on the tried-and-true: email.

You begin with a campaign to your modest internal list, then you plunk down $15k for a big send from a vendor with a highly targeted, high-quality list.

Then ... well, then, nothing.

Your small in-house email campaign chugs along, reaching its goals, but the big rented list ends up getting about 75% of what you expected. Bummer. Serious bummer.

Sound familiar?

For many marketers, it should. According to Marketing Sherpa's 2010 B2B handbook, marketers find solo email sends to proprietary lists far more effective than emails sent to third-party lists (you can download a free chapter of the report here).

Effectiveness of Email Marketing Techniques 

email 

As the chart above shows, more than 7x as many people surveyed by MarketingSherpa find in-house lists more effective than third-party lists.

Why are in-house lists more effective?

It's simple: Subscribers to your in-house list have a relationship with your company; people subscribed to third-party lists do not.

Although marketers typically talk about relationships in the frothy context of social media, they are just as important in the context of email.

When you're sending to an in-house list, you're communicating with a group of people that was attracted to your site and your content. You're using the email to nurture that initial attraction.

When you're sending to a third-party list, the story is different. You're emailing a group of people that have some demographic quality that interests you, but that don't have any context for your content, or your business. That makes it much harder to create a relationship of value.

So what's the takeaway for smart marketers?

Focus your email effort on nurturing and building your own lists. Create content that attracts new people to your site, use calls to action and landing pages to add them to your list, then nurture those relationships via email.

If your organic list growth falls short of your goals, experiment with paid media, but avoid renting lists as much as possible. Instead, invest in paid campaigns that will drive people back to your site and build your own list.

What do you think? Do you get a better return from paid or in-house lists? Looking forward to hearing your thoughts in the comments.

Free Download: Marketing Sherpa's 2010 B2B Handbook

 

A smart, well-researched report on the state of B2B social media, Marketing Sherpa's 2010 B2B Benchmark Report provides a quantitative look at the tactics your peers are employing in email marketing, social media marketing, website management and more. Download it now.

 


Posted by Rick Burnes on Mon, Mar 29, 2010 @ 09:30 AM

COMMENTS

Thanks for the excellent article. I can now pull this out whenever the lead gen conversation turns to the dreaded list rental idea. Despite tragic failures in the past, for some reason this "solution" keeps on popping up. 
 
HIPPOS have short memories, I guess!

posted on Monday, March 29, 2010 at 9:58 AM by CdnJake


I agree 100 percent with your points about the strength of a house list over external lists. In fact, I have seen results where the house-file advantage is far greater than your statistics indicate. I always encourage my clients to make the building of a robust house list a key component of their marketing strategy.

posted on Monday, March 29, 2010 at 10:26 AM by Christopher Ryan


Your blog article matches my experience, Mike. In my long career, I've purchased lists from companies like JigSaw and NetProspex. No matter how I tried, I got very very low open rates and lots of bad data. 
 
Posting great content has built up my in-house lists and the open and click through rates are to die for. 
 
Could not agree more. 
 
Jeff Ogden, President 
Find New Customers "Lead Generation Made Simple" 
http://www.findnewcustomers.net 

posted on Monday, March 29, 2010 at 10:32 AM by Jeff Ogden


Fully agree. I see click-through rates in range of 0.5% for paid lists vs. 2-10% (wide range...many variables) for someone captured on website. And we have not even mentioned the damage done to your brand by sending unsolicited email to a rented list. Consider how your low click-through rate is offset by the 99.5% of people who did not click because the email lacked value to them...you wasted their time.

posted on Monday, March 29, 2010 at 11:10 AM by John Rode


Kind of Funny. I just wrote a blog post about this very same topic the other day. Glad to see that the data supports what I have been telling clients for a long time.  
 
Mark 
Senior Marketing Consultant 
MarkitOverDinner.com

posted on Monday, March 29, 2010 at 8:09 PM by Mark Hall


Comments have been closed for this article.