This is a guest blog post by Dave Clarke, an award-winning editor and editorial director in the marketing departments of Fortune 500 companies, such as Oracle and Symantec. He is currently editorial director for Hologram Publishing, a provider of custom content for companies, large and small.
In a world where “content is king,” you might think that those who publish thousands of articles every day would rule inbound marketing and reign over the modern, online world equivalent of the Roman Empire. And, like Caesar before them, for a time, they did.
That is, until Google unleashed, of all things, a panda, and collapsed their empires the way Odoacer deposed Romulus Augustus and squashed the Roman Empire for good in 476 A.D. Let's take a quick look at how Google's Panda algorithm update changed SEO and what you can do as a marketer to stay on Google's good side.
Before: Sowing a Bumper Crop of Search Results
Known as content factories, farms, or mills (take your pick), the notion behind this business model was simple: Since search engines love fresh content and use keywords to deliver that content, by flooding the web with new content containing the search terms people used most often, you could out-Google Google. Your content would rise to the top of organic search results almost without fail, and people would click through to your content, which was surrounded by advertising...that people would click...and Voila! you were rolling in ad revenue.
It didn’t matter, these media mavens reasoned, whether the content was good or bad, relevant or irrelevant, or for that matter, even coherent. Hire a few code monkeys to formulate an algorithm that culled the most commonly searched keywords and auto-generate article titles. Then, hire freelance writers by the thousands—experienced or not, competent or not—and pay them the equivalent of sweatshop wages to crank out stories assembly-style the way General Mills pops out Cocoa Puffs. Publish these editorial baubles on your website and, by sheer volume alone, you would overwhelm (although spam might be a more-appropriate word) the search engines.
Some, indeed many, of the titles were completely absurd; titles ranged from the ridiculous to the sublime, including “How to Knit a Chicken Coat,” “How Do I Know If My Baby Is Sunnyside Up,” or the all-important, “How to Discipline a Goat.” It didn’t matter. Publish enough variations of these keyword-driven titles and you could virtually own Page 1 of Google organic search on tens of thousands of keywords. These publishing moguls would post as many as 6,000 articles a day, more than all the major news organizations in the country combined.
After: Attack of the Giant Panda
All was going well down on the content farm until… users started complaining. The content was garbage. Increasingly, the search results Google was returning were useless. And users complained in the most effective way they could—by taking their search queries to the competition: Bing and Yahoo!.
As revenue slipped away to competitors, Google began to address the problem by tweaking its search algorithm. The search giant is constantly modifying how it delivers search results, but those changes are usually minor adjustments. This would be a big enough change to warrant a code name: Project Panda.
When Google rolled out the first iteration of Panda in February 2011, the results were significant, but not devastating. When the full-blown version of Panda was released in April 2011, the content factories might as well have been attacked by Godzilla instead of a panda. While the factory owners downplayed the effects of the new algorithm, independent analysts clocked the decline in visibility on Page 1 and subsequent search result pages between 66% and 80%, and the ad revenue streams shrunk accordingly. Not surprisingly, the stock price of these previously prominent publishers tanked by roughly the same amount. Today, although exact figures are not available, instead of 6,000 stories daily, analysts and insiders reckon those publishers now produce an estimated 150 stories.
Today: Relevant Content is King; Long Live the King
The lesson is clear: Content is king, but relevance rules. You cannot publish content for content’s sake. To succeed in search, to consistently get found in Google search, your keywords must be connected to the topic at hand and your content has to be timely and relevant.
How to Kill Your SEO in 3 Easy Steps
Step 1. Post content that is of little to no value, off-topic, or boring. The content mills were living proof that the content you post, whether to your website, blog, Facebook page, or other channels, must be meaningful to customers clicking through to your web pages. Use your content to help customers and prospects solve problems or gain insight into their customers’ behaviors or industry trends. The longer people stay on your page, the more valuable search engine providers consider your content. One of the worst things you can do is provide drab, dull content. Even if it’s relevant, if it’s poorly written and it’s a snoozer, readers will be gone in the click of a mouse.
Step 2. Post content too infrequently. Web content, and especially mobile web content, is often time-sensitive. For a student looking for information about George Washington’s life, a 10-year-old biography entry might still be valuable—providing the content itself is really good from a student-teacher perspective. But, if your business, like many businesses, operates in a constantly evolving environment, you need to post more frequently to get noticed and stay noticed in search results. On the extreme end are businesses focused on the financial sector, health care, or entertainment, where the market changes minute-by-minute or every few days. Even when the information itself is still accurate, search engines factor in how old the content is when deciding which search results to deliver. So, even an educational website will improve its SEO by adding new content about the Father of Our Country once or twice a week.
Step 3. Post content with too few keywords or the wrong keywords. Remember, keywords are at the heart of what search engines do. If the keywords your customers and prospect use to search for your business don’t appear in your content often enough or high enough on the page, you risk not getting found by Google, Bing, or Yahoo!. Still, using keywords requires a delicate touch: more of an art than a science. Use enough keywords to get found, not so many of the same ones over and over used in the same way that you risk alienating readers because the content is redundant and search engines see it as keyword stuffed.
Marketing Takeaway
Inbound marketing and getting found on Google may require a new approach from the days of pushing ads out to prospects, but in the end, you still have to follow the old maxim: Give the customer what he wants; in this case, timely, relevant, quality content based on users’ search terms. And, that’s something even a panda can appreciate (if only he could read!).
Image credit: Kudumomo
Email List Dude 7:53 PM on December 01, 2011
This is a good article. I really didn't know all the points about Panda until I read this.
You can use google alerts to find articles and relevant information that you can comment on to ascertain relevant links correlated to your business vertical. Highly relevant tactic and you should be speaking your real voice and adding value when you comment.
Jim Alamia
rotue72.com
Eli Magids 8:00 PM on December 01, 2011
Nice concise,coherent article. Helpful! Thanks!!!!
Irma Davila 9:08 PM on December 01, 2011
Thank you for this article. It was precise and easy to understand. Most articles written about Panda have been tech-heavy and hard to read.
I am glad to see the content mills go by the wayside, and google rewarding both relevant and timely articles.
Online Advertising 9:52 PM on December 01, 2011
We took a hit with Panda without committing any of the above sins. In fact, when it came to optimised Online Advertising we thought we were doing everything right.
It's taken a while but we are back on top again.
Your article is fantastic advice to all webmasters and mirrors what we tell all our clients day in day out.
Yasmin Bendror 10:39 PM on December 01, 2011
Thank you for such a great insight into Panda - the best explanation I've read so far. I do admire and thank Google as the top SE - thats why Yahoo & Bing were not targeted this way - for taking such a bold step to crush these fake cheaters and get natural results back in check. I am sure Other businesses may have suffered by this, but I believe will bounce back if they stick to real valuable content.
Jana Sheeder 1:23 AM on December 02, 2011
Such a unique name for a search engine algorithm -- Project PANDA! Wonder why? Maybe because Panda bears are black (hat) and white (hat)? Maybe PANDA stands for something ("Protecting Accuracy - Not Deceitful Antics" or something like that?)
I'm so happy that Google is dealing with those who publish nonsensical content just for content's sake. Searches should be about quality not quantity.
I'm so tired of searching and finding the same information (obviously plagiarized from one person to another to another to another) throughout the internet.
Also, too many businesses work too hard to create and share relevant content to have to battle larger companies (or unethical ones) who don't care if their content is legitimate. It's not fair.
Thanks for yet another great and educational blog, HubSpot!
john chambers 2:55 AM on December 02, 2011
Thank you, Mr Clarke (and Jeanne Hopkins) (and Hubspot). This has to rate up with the all-time great blog posts in terms of its clarity and absolute usefulness.
click post 5:01 AM on December 02, 2011
Yes I agree with you guys and really nice and powerfully posting.
Voiture 7:59 AM on December 02, 2011
@jana : Panda is the name of the engineer who worked on this algorithm improvement ;)
Nice explanation, by the way !
HarNganRongRam 8:07 AM on December 02, 2011
Nice article. Helpful! Thanks!!!!
Thank you
Jenna Williams 10:08 AM on December 02, 2011
I worked for a content farm and was getting paid $8 per 300-word article. You do the math.
New Games 10:17 AM on December 02, 2011
Very well explained and useful article - Thank you
Jim Wells 10:37 AM on December 02, 2011
As Po would say, "Sk'doosh!"
Laura 10:48 AM on December 02, 2011
Great article! I understand not to over stuff the content on the pages, but how about meta keywords? I feel I am using every meta keyword associated with my clients webpages, but someone just told me Panda only likes 6-10. Can someone answer that?
Dave Clarke 11:45 AM on December 02, 2011
The more the world changes, the more it stays the same. You can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can't fool the Google gazillions. It's why quality will always trump garbage in the long run. Long live quality content!
Brighter Media 1:02 PM on December 02, 2011
Couldn't agree more. Pay peanuts, get monkeys... What's the point of even spending pennies on content that does nothing for your business. Cheap does not get results and may even result in your site being put in google jail!
Brian Whalley 3:08 PM on December 02, 2011
Hi Laura -
I would strongly recommend staying away from using meta keywords at all. They aren't used as a ranking factor anymore by any of the major engines and have not been for years, and Bing/Yahoo has said that they actually use them as a negative signal, as a signal of possible spam.
I would just remove the meta keywords from the site and don't use them at all. There's no benefit to using that tag anymore.
Best,
Brian Whalley
alex 3:16 PM on December 02, 2011
I wish Google would do better research before they make algorithm changes. It just goes to show you that mathematicians create algorithms but when it comes down to it you cannot predict what all the nuances that will occur.
Jana Sheeder 3:26 PM on December 02, 2011
LOL!!! Thanks, @Voiture!
Jenna Williams 3:36 PM on December 02, 2011
Brian: are you sure search engines aren't using meta keywords? This article says that Bing and Yahoo are: http://www.websynn.com/2011/10/17/are-meta-keywords-still-important-bing-says-yes-google-says-no/