Inbound Internet Marketing Blog

SEO, Blogging, Social Media, Landing Pages, Lead Generation and Analytics

SUBSCRIBE

The HubSpot Inbound Internet Marketing blog covers all of inbound marketing - SEO, blogging, social media, lead generation, email marketing, lead nurturing & management, and analytics. Join 53,183 others and subscribe now!

Subscribe to RSS feed Add us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter

Get Free Marketing Info!

Get the world's best marketing resources right to your inbox! Join more than 817,000 inbound marketers!

Subscribe by email

Your email:

Listen to this blog!

HubSpot's Inbound Internet Marketing Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Shelf Life of Social Media Links Only 3 Hours [Data]

 

.

shelf lifeWhen it comes to link sharing in social media, it turns out it's not about where you share it -- it's about what you share. New research from URL shortening service bitly focuses on how long a link is "alive” before people stop engaging with it and whether it matters what kind of content it is or where it was shared. 

By calculating what bitly is calling the link's 'half life' (the time it takes a link to receive half the clicks it will ever receive after it’s reached its peak), bitly evaluated the persistence of 1,000 popular bitly links, and found some strikingly similar results.

Half Life Research Results

  • The mean half life of a link on Twitter is 2.8 hours.
  • The mean half life of a link on Facebook is 3.2 hours.
  • The mean half life of a link via ‘direct’ sources such as email or instant messaging clients is 3.4 hours.
  • The mean half life of a link on YouTube is 7.4 hours.

halflife density2 resized 600In a nutshell, bitly's research reveals that generally, links shared on Facebook, Twitter, and via direct sources like email or instant message have a shelf life of about 3 hours. This excludes YouTube, where people remain interested in links for more than twice that -- 7 hours! And while you can expect that the majority of links will only remain interesting for less than 2 hours, others can generate a lot more interaction and clicks, lasting for more than 11 hours.

From this, bitly concludes that when it comes to the lifespan of a link (if you exclude YouTube from the equation), it's not where the link is shared that matters; instead, it's more important what the link shares (the content) that has the potential to attract more clicks and engagement.

Marketing Takeaway

Bitly's research indicates that when it comes to promoting content in social media, marketers need to focus mostly on quality. Whether a link makes it in social media depends on the content it points to, so marketers should put the majority of their efforts into creating remarkable content that has the potential to make an impact. It's not enough to just post any links to Facebook and Twitter. Rather, marketers need to make sure that the content they link to is high in quality and valuable to its audience in order to reap the maximum benefits of social media marketing.

When it comes to content creation, are you placing enough emphasis on quality?

Photo Credit: Alex Barth

intro-to-facebook


Posted by Pamela Vaughan on Thu, Sep 08, 2011 @ 08:00 AM

COMMENTS

Not sure how this data indicates that quality matters. If the shelf life of a link is only 3 hours, what difference does it make what it points to? Seems to me the data indicates that WHEN you post is the most important thing.

posted on Thursday, September 08, 2011 at 8:04 AM by Kim Phillips


Pamela, where's your twitter handle so I can follow you? This is a great article and sums up what I've been preaching all along.  
 
What does it mean practically though? How does this tell me an optimum post frequency on each SM presence/publication?  
 
Anyone?

posted on Thursday, September 08, 2011 at 8:32 AM by The Click Whisperer


Kinda agree with Kim here.... 
 

posted on Thursday, September 08, 2011 at 8:58 AM by Anshul


Kim: The reason bitly is saying it's about quality is because posts ranged from a half life of less than 2 hours all the way to 11 hours. They think that what makes a post last longer has to do with the quality of the post, meaning a post that had a half life of 11 hours was probably better quality than a post that lasted less than 2 hours. 
 
@Click Whisperer: The research didn't really focus on post frequency, but here is some data about tweet frequency: http://blog.hubspot.com/blog/tabid/6307/bid/4594/Is-22-Tweets-Per-Day-the-Optimum.aspx. (You can follow me @pamelump) :o)

posted on Thursday, September 08, 2011 at 9:00 AM by Pamela Vaughan


Good content is always the key and probably does make a link last a bit longer. But the main takeaway I see here is that timing is key.

posted on Thursday, September 08, 2011 at 9:40 AM by Kim Phillips


Don't you think the shelf life is longer when others take your link and re-post? For others to take the time to re-post your original link, it must be good quality or it sits on the shelf, just like any other inferior product.

posted on Thursday, September 08, 2011 at 10:37 AM by Delilahj


I tend to agree with Kim here as well. "Quality" is hard to measure and it's speculation that this is the determining factor on link longevity. It seems that Kim's hypothesis on the post timing has more weight and would be easier to demonstrate. I'd be interested in seeing some test cases run....

posted on Thursday, September 08, 2011 at 2:24 PM by Kate Haley


I agree with Delilahj and Kim. I would think reposting plays a factor and timing plays a HUGE factor.

posted on Thursday, September 08, 2011 at 3:00 PM by Hsuan


So bitley needed research to come to the conclusion that quality of content matters? Seriously?

posted on Friday, September 09, 2011 at 7:41 AM by Simon Birt


This tells me that most people don't click on youtube links during work hours. They wait until the end of the day or when they get home. 
 
The delta between FB and Twitter is marginal at best. Don't read too much into this report folks.

posted on Friday, September 09, 2011 at 12:32 PM by Sam Ash


Really interesting post. I'm curious as to the half life of links posted in blogs.

posted on Friday, September 09, 2011 at 1:48 PM by George


I'm with Kim on this one. I thought the "what" was a typo at first. The whole time I was reading this I kept thinking about how it is more important to know what the best time is to post. The what argument maybe would have worked had you talked about edgerank and how better content would lead to higher engagement allowing the edgerank score to be higher thus keeping it in the feed a little longer and allowing it reach a larger group of fans/followers

posted on Friday, September 09, 2011 at 4:16 PM by Nick Phillips


Even though I came across this link a good 24 hours past it's shelf life, I still think it's relevant ;) Great posting.

posted on Friday, September 09, 2011 at 7:17 PM by Debbie Bruce


Comments have been closed for this article.