Internet Marketing Blog

The HubSpot Inbound Internet Marketing blog covers all of inbound marketing - SEO, Blogging, Social Media, Landing Pages, Lead Generation and Analytics.

Subscribe to our RSS Feed
HubSpot RSS Feed

HubSpot on Twitter HubSpot on Facebook HubSpot on LinkedIn HubSpot on Google Buzz HubSpot Blog RSS

Subscribe via Email

Your email:

Get Certified in Inbound Marketing

Inbound Marketing University - Free Marketing Training Online Classes

Inbound Marketing Software

Learn how HubSpot can help turn your business into an inbound marketing machine.

Website Grader Badge

Marketing Resources

Grader.com Tools
 
inbound marketing book

Connect with Us

Want to share your Inbound Marketing advice with the community? Submit guest post ideas to rburnes[at]hubspot[dot]com.

HubSpot's Inbound Internet Marketing Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

What Twitter's Deal with Google Might Mean for Marketers!

 | Submit to Digg digg it | Submit to Reddit reddit | Add to delicious delicious | Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Share on Facebook Facebook | Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn 


The tech-blogosphere is abuzz about the rumor that Twitter is talking to both Google and Microsoft about licensing a full feed of tweets. Kara Swisher broke the news into the echo-chamber:

Twitter is in advanced talks with Microsoft and Google separately about striking data-mining deals, in which the companies would license a full feed from the microblogging service that could then be integrated into the results of their competing search engines. 

I was speaking to HubSpot developer, Dan Abdinoor, this evening while he was spanking me in a ping-pong match. He's currently working on  a handful of enhancements to our social media monitoring tool. Like 100s - if not thousands of applications - our tool uses Twitter's API.  However, as Dan shared with me, Twitter limits the amount of access applications can get to their feed. Rightly so, as it's expensive for Twitter to let 1000s of applications access an API 24 hours a day. 

So, what could Google or Microsoft do if they had full unhindered access to this feed? And why should marketers care? 

More Search Engine Traffic for Twitter (And You)!

Ironically, Twitter could get the deal of a century with this arrangement. If Google and Bing simply display relevant Tweets when users do keyword searches at Google.com or Bing.com, Twitter might get lots of traffic. (According to Alexa, Google already sends Twitter about 10% of its traffic.)  If Google and Bing are willing to pay for the right to index and send more traffic to Twitter, the rest of the world will be pretty jealous. Especially the newspaper industry who's been complaining that Google makes a lot of money off their backs

But, what does it mean for marketers? It means that if you're not using Twitter for marketing and PR yet, you better start. If keyword-rich tweets are displayed on Google and Bing.com, and you're not tweeting, you stand to get none of the increased traffic destined to go from Google to Twitter to ... ? (ie Not you.)

The Search Engines Might Mine The Data to Find Your Industry's Influencers. Then, Use that to Change Regular SERPs. 

I've written many articles on the proper way to build links. However, I also know many informed SEO consultants that still buy links, even though it is in violation of Google's Terms of Service. Many get away with it. It's a broken system -- or a rule that everyone knows can be bent. And it keeps Google from ensuring that the absolute best, unbought, editorially-earned results are presented to searchers. 

Google and Bing could shift reliance away from links on the web, currently as much as 75% of the reason why one site might rank over another for a given keyword. (See SEO 101.)

With access to Twitter's full feed, they could determine which users people trust. They could add a variable in their algorithm that values the links to external sites that are posted in a trusted authority's tweets. This analysis could get pretty sophisticated as HubSpot's Dan Zarella, has shown with his Retweet research

Zarella said people love to retweet new blog posts from users they follow. They also love retweeting content containing links and don't mind being asked for a retweet. Finally, retweets have a snowball effect; a retweeted tweet is more likely to be retweeted again by other users. 

These retweets are an obvious form of an endorsement of quality. 

So, what should marketers do? Start connecting with influencers in your industry. Do keyword searches on http://twitter.grader.com/search and find the influencers relevant to your business. Start sending them resources, responding to their tweets and doing whatever it takes to form relationships. You'll need them to know about the content you're creating, find it interesting and hopefully ... retweet your stuff.

Real Time Search Might Actually Go Mainstream. Are you Publishing in Real Time? Are You Reacting in Real Time? 

I check Techmeme 4 times per day for tech news. Many people keep one eye on Twitter at all times and all day long.  If you can relate, you are among the tragically-connected internet-addicted too.

As indicated by the 50 articles written about this rumor in the span of a few hours, the worlds of news reporting and public reaction are no longer distinct. They are two things that have come together in one indiscernible blob of chatter. Many people call this "real time".

It might not matter that you're not participating in the real time conversation right now. But, if Google and Bing start sending their millions of searchers to read and react to millions of conversations, you better get involved.

If you're worried about a blog post talking smack about your business or product, then you'll have a heart attack if Google invites hordes of un-Twitter-initiated searchers into the un-encumbered conversation. 

So what should marketers do?  Get into the conversation. Start a business blog. Build your Twitter followers and blog subscribers, so that you can participate in the conversation and they can help you amplify your positive messages above the negative and the noise. 

Rumors and Prognostications. 

Since this is just a rumor and I am just guessing what they might do with the data, you can pretty easily dismiss all of this advice. But, you'd still be missing a big opportunity. Used right, Twitter can provide a lot of value to your inbound marketing strategy. Start by watching our Twitter for Marketing and PR recorded webinar. 

Free Inbound Marketing University Online Training Program

Inbound Marketing University

Download HubSpot's Inbound Marketing University online training program

IMU includes 11 free webinar classes and notesheets. The program drills into each component of inbound marketing and prepares you for the Inbound Marketing certification exam.


Posted by Pete Caputa on Fri, Oct 09, 2009 @ 08:31 AM

COMMENTS

I think this would be great for us "early adopters" (if we're still considering this the early stage?). 
 
I'd love to see any deal with Twitter and Google go live.

posted on Friday, October 09, 2009 at 8:50 AM by Toni Anicic


This is a really great post. I just wonder about potential negatives. Twitter already has a huge spam problem. By allowing google and bing to mine the data, you are giving tweets a higher value and enticing even more spammers. Before Twitter makes this deal they need to figure out how to control Twitter spam better. Do you agree?

posted on Friday, October 09, 2009 at 10:38 AM by Danny


I too would love to see this happen. This would obviously be a boon to large and small business alike.

posted on Friday, October 09, 2009 at 11:00 AM by Marty Kauls


Danny - agree that spam is a clear issue (and you think it's bad now--wait until the spammers figure out that retweets add authority...) 
 
The likely way out would be to use something like the PageRank algorithm to evaluate the authority of a Twitter user, relative to both the frequency and authority of the people retweeting them. But that just leads us to self-referencing spam Twitter accounts, much as we have spam blogs now. Maybe a combination of follower count and retweets helps defeat that problem?

posted on Friday, October 09, 2009 at 11:27 AM by Tim Jarrett


I definitely think this would be a good thing - real-time search is becoming more and more prevalent and important. To Danny's point, I agree Twitter needs to come up with better spam-blocking. I am now blocking several spammers every day. I know that spam won't completely go away, but I hope they can manage it better.

posted on Friday, October 09, 2009 at 11:32 AM by Marilyn Moran


I see this as being good for everyone in the sharing information age.

posted on Friday, October 09, 2009 at 11:32 AM by Misty Mays


Great article. I see technology moving much quicker than small and medium sized businesses can adapt. I'm not sure if it is a generational thing, or just a mind set. I find that older business owners are beginning to hate the web and it's speed because it is forcing them to work in their business and not on their business. Of course, this is a bit opposite if you are doing things correct, but they are scared none the less.  
 

posted on Friday, October 09, 2009 at 1:09 PM by Ryan Lewis


Bookmarked this article I too I see technology moving much quicker than small and medium sized businesses can adapt or are willing to learn.  
 
That's so true I own a window cleaning business in Dallas and Plano we offer window cleaning and gutter cleaning, Most of the guys hear just don't want to spend the time doing this

posted on Friday, October 09, 2009 at 1:24 PM by Window Cleaning Dallas


Great article. Our first recommendation to all our advertisers is to create their own @company account and start engaging their customers.  
 
The second is to start sending out offers that are retweet-worthy. The more it gets forwarded, the better for their brand exposure and image (and now, for their search results!) 
 
Disclaimer: I work for Assetize, a Twitter Advertising network

posted on Friday, October 09, 2009 at 2:41 PM by Saif (Assetize)


You bring up some really good points, but there are some problems with it.  
 
If a search engine were to assign authority based on followers, then who would hold the cards? Shaq. Ashton Kutcher. Alissa Milano.  
 
You end up with a system that is far short of the relatively democratic system we have now, and it would be far more prone to corruption, as it puts the power in the hands of a few.  
 
Would 25k get Ashton Kutcher to tweet your link? I bet it would. I'd send him a Bentley if it gave me a huge SERP boost in the topic of my choosing. 

posted on Friday, October 09, 2009 at 9:49 PM by Kevin Spence


Twitter Applications in Brief

posted on Saturday, October 10, 2009 at 1:20 AM by Sweton


Excellent article. It will be interesting to see how tweets are used to lift ones authority. If that stops link buying and other ways to cheat your way up to the top of natural listings, I think it has to be a good thing. 
 
Pat

posted on Saturday, October 10, 2009 at 10:48 AM by Pat Bloomfield


I think this would be a good thing real-time search is becoming very important. 
 
Good post

posted on Saturday, October 10, 2009 at 11:09 AM by Emerson


@Danny, Tim and Kevin.  
 
Interesting thoughts about spam. As I tried to point out in the article, Google has a huge "spam" problem now with paid links. I'm sure they have lots of really smart people working on it, but I've seen a bunch of evidence that says "paid link building" improves rankings. So, obviously they haven't figured out how to defeat paid link spamming and other black hat link building schemes.  
 
I think a big reason for that is because the internet is so open. Anyone can create a site, publish content to it and sell links. They can do this as much as they want. Google can't really track these people down very well, I presume.  
 
I guess the same problem will exist on Twitter to a certain extent. But, my guess is that - in a more structured system - trust and authority can be determined more accurately.  
 
Either way, it's an interesting problem to solve. For some of the math that probably will be used, I'd recommend Social Network Analysis: http://www.amazon.com/Social-Network-Analysis-Applications-Structural/dp/0521387078 
 
There's lots of different ways to mathematically analyze a social graph to determine the relations between people.

posted on Saturday, October 10, 2009 at 12:59 PM by peter caputa


This will make the need for Social Media Marketing even more important. We have just launched our social marketing department and we are seeing great success. This will only help us. Thanks for the info....great read!

posted on Saturday, October 10, 2009 at 7:42 PM by EG Online Marketing


It's so obvious Facebook will buy Twitter and make another 100 people in San Francisco rich! 
 
It's a bull market.

posted on Saturday, October 10, 2009 at 9:15 PM by Financial Samurai


Twitter population is a (tiny) minority companred to the Internet population. 
 
If Twitter population is going to influence the ranking on the search engines this is not democratic.

posted on Monday, October 12, 2009 at 9:21 AM by engago team


@engago The number of people who use twitter is indeed a small % of the online population. 
 
The number of people who actively link to other websites from their own is also a very small % of the population.

posted on Monday, October 12, 2009 at 10:08 AM by peter caputa


I hope Twitter and Google close this deal because it very well could mean more traffic and more followers depending on what you're tweeting.

posted on Monday, October 12, 2009 at 1:20 PM by Nikki Thomas


 
 
I like your thoughts. Can you send me a link to your other posts? 
 
 
Justin Davis 
Disclaimer: Author does not represent any legal position of 
Lightspeed Systems Inc. and is the author's opinion only, and  
Lightspeed only provides an internet filter to K-12 schools and institutions 
 
 
 

posted on Tuesday, October 13, 2009 at 5:15 PM by Justin Davis


Wait. Google already sends Twitter about 10% of its traffic?!?! I'm reeling.

posted on Monday, October 19, 2009 at 2:59 PM by rebekah donaldson


oh,the post is very good.Its exquisite quality, fine craftsmanship, sexy high heels, quirky designs and of course the red outsole known as the symbol of Christian Louboutin shoes.

posted on Friday, October 23, 2009 at 4:16 AM by louboutin boots


Comments have been closed for this article.