Solution for this = bufferapp.com

I applaud this. Its going to get a lot quieter and more real on LinkedIn as a result. People will actually read what you've written, b/c they have to go there to post it.

Luckily it doesn't really impact my social media strategy too much because I have never really relied on this method. But I can't understand the reason they did this - I mean, doesn't it just seem very unnecessary?! 
 
If it ain't broken, don't fix it.

I am not sure this is that bad. It is continent for over worked social media managers but it also clogged up LinkedIn with a lot of frivolous posts from people who posted every tweet on LinkedIn. I think it is way more valuable to be able to send a tweet from LinkedIn then to send a LinkedIn post from Tweeter.

I, for one, am glad this happened. I've grown weary of seeing my LinkedIn news feed full of @ symbols and hashtags from people who are obviously not logging in and would rather just mindlessly blast their updates into LinkedIn via Twitter. 
 
Hopefully this will promote real engagement! 
 
Now, if only Facebook would follow suit :)

I agree with Timothy Lorang that this is better for Linked In than twitter. I think Twitter has it's uses but it clogged Linked In with too much non information. 

I agree that its a good move for LinkedIn users. Irrelevant updates in LinkedIn are a consistent issue and I think it's a good move to send a tweet to Twitter from LinkedIn then the other way around.

Thanks for your nice comments. I am glad that this information has been of use to you. 

I thought thisi was a good way to keep my Linkedin account alive and relevant. Now I must look for some third party appliction to push myTweets into Linkedin. 
Cheers Bjorn Gevert

As others have said, I applaud the change. While HubSpot's use of the linked feature made sense, far too many others cluttered the LinkedIn stream with updates not relevant to that audience. As marketers it forces us to adapt content for each of the platforms and not simply ping the same updates to all channels. Hopefully Facebook is next.

It's great! it forces LinkedIn to get more social whilst staying professional. Though LinkedIn changes seem to evolve more slowly, it's my favorite growing/useful social network

I use both twitter and linkedin to share my updates. I might not want all my tweets to be posted on Linkedin. It would be great idea to share Linkedin updates on twitter.  
 
I welcome this step.

I believe it was a good move as it looks like so many tweets coming from twitter appear as SPAM, so now with Linkedin not showing these any longer, it will be more serious and professional. Good one!

As many have said above ... thank god ... maybe it will get rid of all that useless chatter from LinkedIn. I stopped paying attention to the news feed ages ago. It was impacted with undecipherable tweets and uninteresting re-tweets. 
 
I saw it as the most negative aspect of LinkedIn ... glad to see it go.

Good News for those who hates SPAM. Thanks Anum for sharing ;-)

We've used the automatic push for years to allow clients to post blog posts to Twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook. Since most companies have different followers at each place, this let everyone have easy access to the blog posts. When G+ began emphasizing original content and real human interaction, Facebook soon dropped the autopost option for blogs. This looks like more of the same trend. inconvenient, and it may lead to greater differentiation of the Big Three social media sites, as people are forced to choose which one is really worth their time.

It makes life tedious for me. I'd been queueing 3 tweets a day using Demandforce making sure they had #in. I'd also set my Facebook account to receive tweets. New was a neat way to synch activity across three platforms and audiences with "my" content, most of which was references to others and some of which was my own blog. I can understand the sentiments about noise on Li because of the banal nature of a lot of what is Tweeted. At the same time, if you're receiving trash from connections, then perhaps you've got the wrong ones. This step takes us backwards from one angle, the amount of time needed to manage multiple platforms. Guess we'll just have to become more creative...

This is good. I have watched my LinkedIn stream become mostly RTs (ReTweets for non-Twitter users) automatically cross-posted from Twitter. This means that people are not present on LinkedIn, and are cross-posting conversations out-of-context. They are not spending much time on LinkedIn actually interacting with their business contacts there, establishing relationships, sharing other’s content, conversing, and putting in the time necessary to learn about others who might be there, who are often those with whom they would like to do business. There are partial comments strewn with @names, acronyms, abbreviations and other messages that have caused LinkedIn’s main stream to become little more than broadcast medium, vs. a social medium.  
 
This begs the question: ”If everyone is cross-posting from other social networking sites, and are not present, who is going to be on LinkedIn to actually read that content that is being posted?”  
 
Group activity and discussions can overcome this lack of presence in the main stream, but that’s a conversation for another day.  

If you require fans so you can have bragging rights, robot generated fans can be delivered under 24 hours.and also above infomation is very useful. 

If you require fans so you can have bragging rights, robot generated fans can be delivered under 24 hours.and also above infomation is very useful. 

This is a fantastic move and, frankly, will only be good for marketers, because their posts on LinkedIn will actually be seen by people and not buried in a sea of irrelevant tweets.

Things like this hopefully not a major adverse impact on my web marketing strategy in social media

I agree with the enthusiasm above. I think it's a great move. Twitter updates clogging up LinkedIn can be trying. Nice update!