Inbound Internet Marketing Blog

SEO, Blogging, Social Media, Landing Pages, Lead Generation and Analytics

SUBSCRIBE

The HubSpot Inbound Internet Marketing blog covers all of inbound marketing - SEO, blogging, social media, lead generation, email marketing, lead nurturing & management, and analytics. Join 53,183 others and subscribe now!

Subscribe to RSS feed Add us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter

Get Free Marketing Info!

Get the world's best marketing resources right to your inbox! Join more than 817,000 inbound marketers!

Subscribe by email

Your email:

Listen to this blog!

HubSpot's Inbound Internet Marketing Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Google's SSL Change Actually Impacts 11% of Search Traffic [New Data]

 

.

In the last week of October, Google announced and rolled out a major change to the way its search engine interacts with the rest of the web. Google now uses an SSL-encrypted experience for anyone who uses the Google.com homepage while logged in as a Google user. As a result of this change and how the web works, Google no longer passes search referral data to the destination website when a logged-in user clicks on a search result.

This can sound really technical, but what it means is that, as a website owner, you lose visibility into which keywords a person logged into Google.com searched for before they arrived at your website. Even if you use Google-owned website analytics like Google Analytics, you no longer have access to specific keyword information about how those searchers discovered your website.


Keywords Over Chart

Google's Anticipated Effect vs. Reality

According to Google, this change was supposed to represent a single-digit percentage of traffic to most website owners. (Google estimated that the change would impact less than 10% of searches conducted on a daily basis.) Google's rationale was that most people using Google just don’t use the www.google.com homepage, and if they do, they may not be logged in to Google’s services at the time of their search.

However, watching our analytics for HubSpot, we noticed that the amount of traffic to www.hubspot.com that came in without keyword information was immediately about 13% of our overall search engine traffic -- quite a bit more than Google’s prediction in the single digits. As a result, we wanted to examine what this looked like for our 5,600+ customers to determine if we were just one unlucky outlier, and what the average business owner or marketer on the web is experiencing.

To address the specifics of our analysis, the following data is based on 5,644 HubSpot customers who use HubSpot’s analytics package on their website. The data sample includes all visits from November 1st through November 9th for these sites. All statistics were calculated with a 95% confidence interval.

Google's Change Actually Affects 11.36% of HubSpot Customers' Organic Search Traffic

Across all sites, 11.36% of organic search traffic has arrived without a keyword set during this time period for the average HubSpot customer. However, some of our users have seen a dramatically greater loss of intelligence than that. At least 423 HubSpot customers have experienced more than 20% of their organic search traffic getting stuck in this #SSLpocolypse black hole, and 15 others have lost more than 50% of their traffic's keyword data. For those 438 websites, this change has had a dramatic impact on how they plan their websites' future content, and how they understand the leads that convert on their website. In order to better understand how different types of businesses were affected by this change, we broke down this data across some of the available metrics we had on these websites.

Are Different Types of Websites Affected Differently?

For one segment, we cut the data set down to only include websites that received more than 500 organic search visits in that week -- meaning they were a better optimized site that contained a greater number of pages. However, the data in this set was very similar. The average customer in this set had lost 10.69% of the tracking on their organic search traffic, with a very small standard deviation of 4.91% and just a 0.09% magnitude of error. If you’re not very familiar with statistics, this means that just 16% (or about 200) of the websites in this data set had lost more than 15.6% of their search engine intelligence. While no individual customers in this set had lost more than 50% of their search referrers, 54 of these 1,255 companies still lost more than 20% of their search intelligence. It is clear that this change has had a dramatic impact on the search marketing and SEO efforts of many businesses around the world.

We also segmented this across companies that were actively blogging vs. companies that do not blog actively. Because companies that are blogging regularly are more likely to be chasing a healthy long-tail keyword strategy, we thought we might see a difference here and that companies blogging more would be losing more of their traffic intelligence. Surprisingly, there was no significant difference here. The average website with a regularly updated blog lost 10.41% of the intelligence on their search engine traffic, with a small standard deviation of 6.34% and just a 0.22% magnitude of error. We also looked at cutting this data across other segments, such as number of employees, B2B vs. B2C, and industry, but we did not uncover any significant patterns or differences. It appears that for once, a change by Google may not have impacted different types of businesses in a dramatic fashion.

What have you noticed about the search referral data for your website? Have you seen different levels of success or intelligence since the Google SSL change? Consider joining the discussion and sharing your specific results on Twitter using the hashtag #SSLpocolypse.

learning-seo-experts

By Brian Whalley

Posted by Brian Whalley on Fri, Nov 11, 2011 @ 08:00 AM

COMMENTS

The fact that: as a website owner, you lose visibility into which keywords a person logged into Google.com searched for before they arrived at your website 
 
is simply scary. I do like Google an its long list of products. But this seems a bit like a supermarket loyalty card scheme. Google takes data about you from you – and does not share that data back to you. I smell trouble… :) 
 

posted on Friday, November 11, 2011 at 8:06 AM by Ivan @IrishRecruiter


For my hubspot account it looks like its about 12.25%, which is concerning. Thank you for putting this together though, great article!

posted on Friday, November 11, 2011 at 8:44 AM by Pat Palingo


Interesting, our stats are showing a 36% increase in Google visitors with unknown keyword.

posted on Friday, November 11, 2011 at 8:52 AM by Gary Stockton


Brian: 
 
We're seeing a 10% effect so far. My question though is how do we know if Google has this 100% rolled out yet. . ?  
 
@CPollittIU

posted on Friday, November 11, 2011 at 8:56 AM by Chad H. Pollitt


Looks like around 14% on my stats

posted on Friday, November 11, 2011 at 8:59 AM by Mark


Sounds like google wants to diminish the power of seo while increasing the power of paid search (google adwords).

posted on Friday, November 11, 2011 at 9:17 AM by kiril alexandrov


I agree with Kiril. Google is trying to move more people to paid search!

posted on Friday, November 11, 2011 at 10:04 AM by Rich


Our stats have been greatly affected, but the green keeps going up and to the right so I'm not too paranoid.

posted on Friday, November 11, 2011 at 10:34 AM by Sam


Silly question! 
Is everyone focused only on Keyword.. 
Several of my clients are getting great referral traffic from Inbound Marketing. 
Seems that KIND OF TRAFFIC really converts. 
Realize the importance of the Keyword stuff, but there never has been much control over that.... 
YOU can control Inbound Marketing

posted on Friday, November 11, 2011 at 5:05 PM by Chuck Bartok


My stats are that I've lost more than 23% of my search intelligence on my more than 2500 organic search visits per week, of which 92% are from new visitors. Yes, I still have traffic and yes, they still convert, but we have lost our intelligence on what converts and why. We control inbound marketing but knowing what our visitors are looking for is important to our inbound marketing plan. 
 
Thanks for the clear analysis of what (not provided) means in your Google Analytics dashboard.

posted on Saturday, November 12, 2011 at 6:10 PM by Debra Murphy


It is affecting 15% of our overall traffic and 64% of our leads....quite frustrating if I say so myself...

posted on Monday, November 14, 2011 at 10:54 AM by Rebecca Candia


I believe having ssl is going to be ranking factor and it is better to move to ssl as soon as possible. this way you can have your referral data too

posted on Tuesday, November 15, 2011 at 2:48 PM by mumin


Elizabeth, as I said in my other post, HubSpot was bought by Google so it's not a 3rd-party company - it's Google. And since we're already paying Google via our HubSpot monthly fee, we should have access to this data just like paying advertisers do. Please provide a response to my original post - why is HubSpot/Google withholding this information? Approximately 25% of my traffic is being affected.

posted on Tuesday, November 15, 2011 at 4:45 PM by Andrew Berkowitz


Thank you Google for giving the middle finger to anyone that uses Google Analytics to track how customers found their website. I bet if we paid the 150k for your premium we can see the keywords. You're hurting the small businesses. You're only favoring the big companies that spend tons of money on adwords.

posted on Tuesday, November 15, 2011 at 5:46 PM by Troy Glancy


@Andrew Berkowitz, Google does not own hubspot.

posted on Tuesday, November 15, 2011 at 5:51 PM by Troy Glancy


From the Wall Street Journal, March 9, 2011 - Google Ventures participates in a $32 million venture capital round "which will be used in part to buy out current shareholders." http://blogs.wsj.com/venturecapital/2011/03/08/google-ventures-sequoia-salesforce-give-hubspot-32m/

posted on Tuesday, November 15, 2011 at 7:56 PM by Andrew Berkowitz


Any response from HubSpot/Google?

posted on Thursday, November 17, 2011 at 8:20 AM by Andrew Berkowitz


83% of our November traffic has not passed any keyword data. Furthermore, I have noticed distinct patterns with active G+ photographers' previous keywords dropping off as much as 95%, about in-line with what I would expect of that audience to be logged into google. Ridiculous.

posted on Thursday, November 24, 2011 at 11:04 AM by Joshua Camp


Comments have been closed for this article.